Practise architecture, phase by phase
Self-guided scenarios across the six phases of the solution architect workflow. Pick a stage, choose a scenario, submit your work, get graded against a reference.
How grading works
Scores combine machine-checkable checks (structure, coverage) with reference comparison. Dimensions needing human judgment are labelled pending and excluded from the score until reviewed. The reference solution is revealed only after you submit.
15:00
Write as many Architecture Decision Records as you think relevant for this scenario. Each ADR should capture a significant architectural decision: what was the context, what did you decide, and what are the consequences?
Diagram / proposal to review
Find the flaws. Each planted flaw you catch scores 70% ÷ total_flaws. False positives hurt your precision score. Add a flaw for each issue you find — one per entry.
Diagram source
Preview
Click Render to preview
Fill in each section below. The grader checks that you have named the right stakeholders, classified constraints correctly, and identified key quality attributes.
Stakeholder map
Quality attributes + trade-offs
Hard constraints
Soft constraints
Architecture document (pre-loaded from project)
Tip: each top-level heading becomes a slide. Fenced ```plantuml or ```mermaid blocks become rendered diagrams.
Generated Slidev slides
Loading…